Reference: Bad Diver
I have received positive and constructive comments from readers on this issue. Hopefully with their permission, I will post them here. The question was – Bad Instructor or Bad Diver?:
clos Says:
both
Snafu Says:
Why Both? Is always the instructor & instruction…as for the diver if they are lucky they will meet good diver that will help them BUT most of the case the diver will meet another diver that will slack & put em down insted of helping them to improve by showing it to them.
Most instructor .. MOST INSTRUCTOR do teaching for the MONEY, by cutting time on the teaching, Money they earn become bigger … NEW student wont even know where to start, or what is wrong … dey just ask How much & how long…. den get exploited by DIVING SHOP…DIVING Instructor…etc…etc
By the time they know the right method or right people… new diver pick up BAD HABBIT already & hard to be corrected.
Not that the INSTRUCTOR dont know anyway… but dey keep on doing it, ALL IN THE NAME OF MONEY!!!
Dig It hommieeeeeeEEEeeEEeee!!!!!
idcpro Says:
hhmm…I would say both are not wrong and right. In a scuba lesson there’s 2 things we have to keep in mind. Performance requirements and Mastery. I believe most student divers meet the performance requirements as well as the Instructor, well…as long as they meet all performance requirements, the Instructor can certify them. The question now is did they Master what they have learned? Mastery of a skill involves in the attitude of the Instructor, the Instructor just need to spend a little more time to repeat the skills in the confined water and questions like “why i only can hover at the surface?†or “why I keep floating or get headache after each dive†will not appear.
Good or bad diver depends on both the Instructor and student diver. It’s the student divers responsibility to transfer most knowledge learned in the manual apply it to actual diving and Instructors attitude towards his/her own teaching.
kimi Says:
It’s pity to the student if they got a lousy instructor. For me, the world doesn’t stop there. I’m willing to move forward n to improve myself.
Luckily for me, i got a very good dive buddy who can teach me to be better in every dive i do.
He knows who he is. Thanks bro!
SayLeng Says:
Both. Instructors must teach completely (no cutting corners) and students must learn properly (ask, understand, analyze, confirm & practice).
Ling Says:
I feel it is both. Well, instructions given definitely will affect how one dive that’s where they first contact with diving. But the diver himself must also be open and willing to learn. Be flexible to any constructive feedback.
So far the general concensus is that both parties are equally at fault and otherwise.
idcpro is correct in saying an instructor should not certify the student if requirements or part of, are not or have not been met. The instructor should use a little more time in transfering knowledge to the student. The student, on the other hand, needs to apply knowledge received to his/her diving.
Say Leng has summarised the points above into: Instructors should not cut corners (as in the case of the 20:1 ratio I had seen), and students should “ask, understand, analyze, confirm and practiceâ€.
Ling concurs saying how instructions have been given to the student determines the outcome of the diver. ut the diver must also be open and willing to learn.
We all learn as we go along. The mould the instructor casts is the gateway to either pleasure or torture when one is underwater. However, the diver, as he/she progresses, should be open and learn during each dive. Skills are taught not to be forgotten. Therefore the only way one doesn’t forget is by practising these skills underwater. I may have been diving since 1982, but I make it a point to practice most of my skills (whenever possible) during my first dive of the trip. Still, I do get complacent: I once did rapid descent to about 20 meters without the regulator being in my mouth, and instead of using my octopus which is usually placed at the D-ring near my chest, I did a CESA; second was using twin-tanks ready for rapid descent (wing fully deflated), jumped in and realised that I did not have either fins on. In the first case, had I remembered or practised switching to my octopus regularly, then I would have remembered having an octopus as a back-up. In the second case, had I done my equipment check topside, I wouldn’t have had to struggle using my hands to propel myself back to the surface from 28 meters.
So in my case, I was (and hopefully no longer am) a bad diver.
You must be logged in to post a comment.