Mulut Puaka

DAP’s Tony Pua is known to many as Tony Puaka as he has the uncanny ability to blurt out stupid and insensible statements. He is known to be a loudmouth who opens his mouth before his brain cells, if any brain at all, could function. In the older days he would be described as “mulut pantat ayam” referring to a certain rear orifice of a hen that is always open.

Tony would have a statement for everything and anything that would boost his ratings in DAP. As a member of the PAC he contradicted the PAC’a findings on 1MDB, the very same findings that he is a signatory of. Tony, being the mulut puaka that he is, also belittled other religions by making very insensitive statements:


His mouth is also a testament to his racist being. Feeling superior as a staunch Christian, he also ridicules other Chinese who are not Christians. This is depicted in a DAP-leaning blog:




The good thing about wanting to project himself as the righteous staunch Christian is that he finally made sense in March 2016 when he said that there is no need for Lim Guan Eng to step down as the Chief Minister of Penang as the latter was only being investigated for corruption. He however added that Lim should step down if charged:



If you think I made this up, you can watch this video of him saying it.

Being a staunch and righteous Christian Tony Pua should not lie and now insist on Lim Guan Eng to go on leave. Don’t use stupid excuses such as “this is different as the charges are politically motivated” because it was not any of the Barisan Nasional component parties that asked Lim Guan Eng to make deals with Phang Li Koon, and it certainly wasn’t any of the Barisan Nasional component parties that made Lim Guan Eng pen his signature on those documents. Yet, when Najib was being investigated you made no qualms about asking him to step down until he clears his name.

How now, Tony? Are you or are you not going to keep to your words and insist on Lim Guan Eng stepping down until the trial process has been exhausted? Or are you, being the PUAKA that you are, going to drop Christianity and Christian values to protect a man, charged for corruption and abuse of power, for political reasons?

Or are you going to do another Rafizi?

 

Rashid Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang Melayu Pertama?

Masihkah anda ingat skandal-skandal yang pernah membelenggu UMNO akibat salahlaku dua orang penjawat awam UMNO pada tahun 1990an dan awal 2000? Sekiranya anda terlalu muda untuk mengingati peristiwa-peristiwa tersebut, mari kita imbas semula kejadian-kejadian tersebut.


Kejadian pertama pada tahun 1997 melibatkan Menteri Besar Selangor ketika itu iaitu Tan Sri Muhammad bin Mohd Taib. Muhammad yang sebelum itu mempunyai satu lagi skandal iaitu berkahwin lari bersama Tengku Zahariah binti Tengku Abdul Aziz Shah di Takbai, Selatan Thailand pada tahun 1993, telah ditahan di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Brisbane, Australia kerana cuba membawa keluar wang berjumlah RM2.4 juta tanpa membuat deklarasi kepada pihak berkuasa Australia.


Apabila didakwa di mahkamah di Brisbane, Muhammad dengan segera melepaskan jawatan beliau sebagai Menteri Besar negeri Selangor.


Muhammad diganti oleh Abu Hassan Omar yang ketika itu merupakan seorang Ahli Parlimen. Satu pilihanraya kecil serentak terpaksa diadakan di Parlimen Kuala Selangor dan DUN Permatang untuk membolehkan Abu Hassan bertukar kerusi dengan Jamaluddin Adnan. Namun Abu Hassan tidak lama menjawat jawatan sebagai Menteri Besar Selangor kerana didakwa terbabit dengan suatu skandal seka dan beliau pula melepaskan jawatan pada tahun 2000.

Maka, saya berpendapat adalah baiknya Saudara Lim Guan Eng juga meletakkan jawatan beliau sebagai Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang kerana telahpun didakwa atas kesalahan salahguna kuasa dan rasuah pada 30hb Jun 2016. Pertamanya, ianya tidak akan menyebabkan dakwaan terhadapnya terpalit dan memburukkan lagi nama parti beliau, DAP.

Kedua, sekiranya beliau tidak meletakkan jawatan ianya boleh membenarkan beliau masih mempengerusikan mesyuarat-mesyuarat yang melibatkan hal ehwal jawatankuasa kelulusan projek negeri Pulau Pinang. Sudah tentu ini akan merupakan percanggahan kepentingan bukan sahaja bagi pihak beliau, malahan juga buat Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang.

Ketiga, jika kita imbau kembali peristiwa Tan Sri Muhammad di Brisbane, Lim Guan Eng ada membuat kenyataan berikut kepada para pemberita asing:


Maka eloklah beliau lepaskan jawatan Ketua Menteri kerana ia membawa malu yang amat sangat kepada negara. Dan seperti kata beliau sendiri, “Ianya tidak memberi petunjuk baik mengenai tahap kawalan rasuah di Malaysia.”

Mungkin sudah sampai masanya Timbalan Ketua Menteri 1, YB Dato Haji Mohd Rashid bin Hasnon, mengambil alih pucuk pimpinan negeri. Saya amat yakin DAP, sebagai sebuah parti pelbagai bangsa, bersetuju dengan saranan saya ini.

RM305 Juta Hanya Untuk Kertas?


KENYATAAN MEDIA
Abdul Rahman Dahlan

Pengarah Strategik Komunikasi Barisan Nasional
6 Mei 2016
Untuk Siaran Segera
1. Pada November 2015, seorang Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) BN dari Pulau Pinang mengemukakan usul pada Sidang DUN supaya semua projek tambakan laut di negeri itu dibentang untuk pendengaran awam sebelum dimuktamadkan. 

Bagaimanapun, lima ADUN PKR tidak mengundi manakala seorang wakil rakyat DAP menyokong usul berkenaan.

Insiden itu menimbulkan kemarahan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang merangkap Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng, yang mendakwa tindakan enam ADUN itu sebagai ‘menikamnya dari belakang’.
2. Susulan itu, Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang memecat dua ADUN PKR berkenaan daripada menjadi pengerusi anak syarikat Kerajaan Negeri pada Februari 2016. Tempat mereka diganti oleh dua Ahli Parlimen DAP, masing-masing dari Negeri Sembilan dan Selangor.

 

3. Pada 24 Februari 2016, seorang daripada ADUN PKR yang dilucutkan jawatan, YB Cheah Kah Peng, mendedahkan kepada media, antara sebab enam ADUN PKR dan DAP memutuskan untuk tidak menentang usul BN adalah berikutan Laporan Jalan Utama dan Projek Terowong yang disediakan oleh Jawatankuasa Kira-Kira Wang Awam negeri.
Laporan berkenaan menyatakan, Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang bersetuju membayar RM138, 971, 572.61 bagi laporan kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan reka bentuk apabila laporan kebolehlaksanaan Terowong Pulau Pinang serta laporan Penilaian Impak Alam Sekitar (EIA) tidak disiapkan.

 

YB Cheah dilaporkan berkata, ramai ADUN mendapati sukar membuat justifikasi terhadap bayaran sebesar itu bagi kajian kebolehlaksanaan.  
4. Berdasarkan kajian kami dan kenyataan umum Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang, kami percaya bayaran itu adalah sebahagian daripada sejumlah RM305 juta yang diperuntukkan untuk kajian kebolehlaksanaan, reka bentuk terperinci dan laporan EIA bagi projek Terowong Pulau Pinang serta tiga laluan berkaitan.
RM305 juta hanya untuk kertas kerja asas.
5. Kami berkongsi kebimbangan 6 ADUN berkenaan yang menyifatkan RM305 juta adalah harga yang amat tinggi untuk dibayar bagi sekadar kertas kerja dan laporan. Tambahan pula, keperluan pelaksanaan projek itu masih diragui susulan pergerakan trafik di Jambatan Pulau Pinang yang secara umumnya masih rendah.
Kami yakin, peruntukan sejumlah RM305 juta boleh dimanfaatkan untuk kebajikan penduduk Pulau Pinang. Jumlah RM305 juta adalah dua kali ganda berbanding RM176 juta yang dibelanjakan Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang dari tahun 2009 hingga 2015 bagi Program Kebajikan Emas khusus buat warga tua, ibu tunggal, mereka yang mempunyai keperluas khas, pelajar, suri rumah, bayi baharu dilahirkan dan mahasiswa.
6. Lebih-lebih lagi, Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang melantik Consortium Zenith BUCG (CZBUCG) untuk menyediakan laporan kebolehlaksanaan ini bagi menentukan kesesuaiannya. CZBUCG adalah syarikat sama yang akan melaksanakan projek itu jika didapati bersesuaian.
Jelas sekali, Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang tidak memahami istilah “percanggahan kepentingan.” 
Malah, syarikat subkontraktor pertama yang dilantik oleh CZBUCG pada tahun 2013 bagi melakukan kajian kebolehlaksanaan ialah Astral Supreme Construction Sdn Bhd, yang mengakui gagal menyiapkan laporan itu pada Ogos 2014.

 

Pemeriksaan lanjut di Pendaftar Syarikat (RoC) mendedahkan CZBUCG adalah pemegang saham utama yang mengawal pemegang saham Astral Supreme — sekali lagi menampilkan berlakunya percanggahan kepentingan.
Ketika projek berkenaan dianugerahkan pada tahun 2013, CZBUCG dilaporkan berkata, laporan berkenaan dijangka siap menjelang April 2014.

 

Selepas banyak kali tertangguh, kami kini dimaklumkan laporan kajian kebolehlaksanaan itu ditunda lagi ke tarikh yang tidak dinyatakan – gambaran bahawa keseluruhan projek itu akan ditangguh.
Beberapa laporan media menyatakan paling awal keseluruhan projek itu dapat disiapkan ialah pada tahun 2025.
7. Laporan kepada Bursa Malaysia oleh Ewein Berhad bertarikh 31 Mac 2015, mengesahkan Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang membuat pembayaran pertama pada 17 Februari 2015, dalam bentuk kawasan perdana di tepi laut. Berdasarkan maklumat Bursa, syarikat usaha sama syarikat Ewein telah membeli kawasan tanah berkenaan daripada CZBUCG.    

                 
8. Pendedahan lanjut oleh Ewein Berhad menunjukkan dua perjanjian bertarikh 28 Disember 2015 dan 15 Januari 2016 telah ditandatangani untuk membeli dua lagi plot kawasan perdana tepi laut berhampiran Gurney Drive daripada CZBUCG.

 

Jika dihitung, ketiga-tiga perjanjian ini membabitkan pembelian tanah bernilai RM3.14 bilion daripada CZBUG yang sudah atau akan diberi oleh Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang sebagai bayaran projek walaupun kajian kebolehlaksanaan belum disiapkan.
9. Difahamkan, kos RM6.3 bilion bagi keseluruhan projek akan dibiayai oleh Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang menerusi bayaran dalam bentuk tanah perdana tepi laut kekal yang dikenal pasti seluas 110 ekar, dinilai mengikut harga tahun 2013.
Apa yang menimbulkan persoalan ialah mengapa Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang menetapkan harga tanah perdana mengikut harga tahun 2013 bagi projek yang hanya akan disiapkan 12 tahun akan datang iaitu pada tahun 2025?
Oleh kerana tanah perdana pinggir laut Pulau Pinang adalah aset cepat meningkat nilainya, ini bermakna kawasan seluas 110 ekar itu akan bernilai dua atau tiga kali ganda menjelang tahun 2025 – bermakna projek itu akhirnya akan menyebabkan rakyat Pulau Pinang menanggung kos RM20 bilion atau lebih.
10. Sebagai tambahan kepada membiayai sepenuhnya kos RM6.3 bilion itu, Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang turut memberi CZBUCG konsesi selama 30 tahun untuk mengutip tol bagi terowong berkenaan.
Ini jauh berbeza dengan amalan biasa perjanjian konsesi yang mana syarikat konsesi akan membiayai projek dan mengutip tol bagi memperoleh kembali pelaburan mereka.
Dalam hal ini, nampaknya Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang akan membiayai keseluruhan pembinaan bagi membolehkan syarikat terbabit mengaut keuntungan dan menikmati keuntungan pada masa depan menerusi kutipan tol.
Dan bukankah jalan bertol bertentangan dengan manifesto Pakatan?

 

11. Pendedahan berterusan berkaitan Taman Manggis dan banglo Ketua Menteri di Jalan Pinhorn yang dijual pada harga lebih rendah berbanding nilai pasaran, menarik tumpuan terhadap pelbagai perjanjian tanah negeri itu oleh Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang sejak tahun 2008 bernilai RM40 bilion atau lebih.
Sehubungan itu, kami mendesak Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang menjelaskan perkara yang berkenaan: 
1) Jelaskan mengapa kos keseluruhan pelbagai kajian mengenai projek itu yang pada dasarnya adalah kertas kerja, boleh mencecah sehingga RM305 juta?
2) Apakah penanugerahan untuk melakukan kajian ini dibuat secara tender terbuka? Jika ya, tolongan jelaskan mengapakah kajian kebolehlaksanaan awal dianugerahkan kepada pihak yang tidak melantik perunding atau pakar sepatutnya untuk melengkapkan tugas itu sebelum mengakui ia tidak boleh dilakukan.
3) Mengapa syarikat swasta itu menerima bayaran pendahuluan berjumlah RM139 juta walaupun kajian belum disiapkan?
4) Jika kajian kebolehlaksanaan mendapati projek tidak sesuai diteruskan, apakah Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang akan memperoleh kembali RM139 juta yang sudah dibayar?

 

5) Apakah syarikat swasta itu didenda kerana kegagalan menepati tarikh akhir projek yang dipersetujui?

 

6) Walaupun bersetuju membiayai sepenuhnya kos pembinaan, mengapa Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang bersetuju memberi konsesi tol selama 30 tahun kepada syarikat terbabit.
7) Mengapa Kerajaan DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang bersetuju membayar dengan menggunakan 110 ekar tanah perdana di tepi laut – bernilai RM6.3 bilion pada tahun 2013 – bagi projek yang hanya akan disiapkan paling awal pun pada tahun 2025, dengan mengambil kira kawasan yang telah dikenal pasti ini mungkin bernilai dua atau tiga kali ganda berbanding RM6.3 bilion pada tahun 2025?
Apakah ini bermakna kos sebenar projek bagi rakyat Pulau Pinang boleh melonjak tiga kali ganda dan mencecah RM20 bilion?

Tokong Mustn’t Lie

        
The above was sent to Lim Guan Eng. it states the valued price of the bungalow at No.25, Jalan Pinhorn. Yet, Guan Eng had the cheek to say the following:

  
It seems impossible for Guan Eng to NOT know about the value of the property or his claim to NOT know about the plans for the land at Taman Manggis. Mind you, let us see what are his other portfolios:

  
I have a message for you, Guan Eng:

  

Is The MACC On The Opposition’s Payroll?

I found the following on My Nation:

  
For the pasr three days I have been wondering if the MACC is part of the conspiracy as mentioned by Muhyiddin a few days back. The inaction by MACC on cases involving civil servants and Barisan Nasional politicians is telling…blatantly. This latest action by MACC seems like a red herring, a diversion from the pressure it is facing:

RM0.00 SPRM tahan 9 orang termasuk seorang pegawai kanan sebuah kementerian terlibat sindiket salah guna dana kerajaan.Akibatnya rugi dana RM100 juta-Agendanews
RM0.00 PENGARAH Siasatan SPRM,Datuk Azam Baki di PC tadi kata pegawai yang berjawatan Setiausaha Bahagian itu dianggar terima suapan RM20 juta-Agendanews
RM0.00 PEGAWAI itu kerap terbang first class keluar negara dgn keluarga.Banyak jam mahal.Ada satu RM400,000,kereta mewah,barang kemas,beg2 berjenama -Agendanews

Fine that it is acting against errant civil servants but has it said anything about Lim Guan Eng’s case.

Suddenly, Lim Guan Eng came up with a very weird statement:

Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng today expressed surprise over the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) saying it previously investigated his tenancy at a Penang home, saying it never contacted him regarding the case.
He also questioned why the MACC neither announced that it had investigated him over the issue nor the outcome of the investigation.
“It is intriguing that the MACC in Penang said it once investigated my tenancy at the home in 2009. If that is so, why did it not announce to the public in 2009 that this was baseless?
– See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/after-macc-reveals-past-probe-guan-eng-questions-silence-about-outcome

It begs the question: is the MACC on the Opposition’s payroll?

Will MACC Not Act Again?

  
Today, Datuk Huan Cheng Guan has lodged a report against Lim Guan Eng on the No.25 Jalan Pinhorn property issue and how it is linked to the Taman Manggis land sale.

Earlier, Lim Guan Eng mentioned in a press conference that he had no knowledge that the Taman Manggis land had been earmarked for the construction of low-cost affordable homes. Perhaps Guan Eng also suffers from memory loss like Mahathir:

  
The MACC, probably under pressure to do something as the spotlight is now on the agency, has announced that an investigation paper has been opened on the Lim Guan Eng case:

  
A previous investigation on Lim Guan Eng was forwarded to the MACC HQ in 2010 but there was no further action – not even forwarded to the then-Attorney-General, not even to its oversight panel. Of course there wasn’t any donkey cries as in the recent case of the SRC/1MDB. Let me recap:

12-02-2010, 06:58 PM

GEORGETOWN: Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) Pulau Pinang sudah menyerahkan kertas siasatan berkaitan kos ubah suai dan sewa banglo mewah Ketua Menteri, Lim Guan Eng, kepada ibu pejabat suruhanjaya itu di Putrajaya, bulan lalu.
Perkara itu disahkan Pengarah SPRM negeri, Datuk Latifah Md Yatim, pada sidang media di pejabatnya di sini, pagi ini.
“Kami sudah serahkan kepada ibu pejabat untuk tindakan lanjut,” katanya yang enggan mengulas lanjut.
Julai lalu, Pemuda Gerakan Pulau Pinang, membuat laporan kepada SPRM berhubung kos pengubahsuaian banglo mewah yang disewa Guan Eng di Jalan Pinhorn di sini.
Laporan itu dibuat selepas Guan Eng tidak memberi maklum balas terhadap permintaan Gerakan yang mahu beliau menjelaskan isu berkaitan banglo sewa itu termasuk nilai sewaan.
Ketua Menteri berpindah ke banglo berkenaan kerana kediaman rasmi, Seri Teratai di sini, mengalami kerosakan serta banyak anai-anai.

Pada sidang media itu, Latifah juga memaklumkan tiada tindakan pendakwaan terhadap mana-mana pihak berhubung dakwaan Aminah Abdullah bahawa beliau cuba disogok supaya menarik diri pada pilihan raya kecil Dewan Undangan Penanti, Mei lalu.
“SPRM memperakukan tiada mana-mana pihak akan didakwa dalam kes ini,” katanya.
Menjelang pilihan raya kecil itu, Aminah yang bertanding atas tiket Bebas mendakwa didatangi pemimpin Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) dengan menawarkan jawatan Yang Dipertua Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang (MPPP) dan wang tunai RM80,000 supaya menarik diri daripada bertanding.
Aminah, yang juga bekas Ketua Wanita PKR negeri turut mendakwa PKR menawarkan jawatan Timbalan Ketua Menteri I jika beliau menang pilihan raya kecil itu, dengan syarat menyertai semula parti itu.

Beliau mendakwa didatangi seorang pegawai kepada Exco kerajaan negeri dan seorang ahli majlis PKR negeri untuk membuat tawaran itu.

So when an investigation paper on a member of the Opposition gets to the MACC HQ, it enters a black hole.

We will see how far will this “investigative” effort get. Perhaps, it will be just another NFA.

By the way, does anyone still remember that there was an allegation of abuse of power by a senior ranking MACC officer but was dismissed by the MACC top man? Apparently there already was a police report being made on that in Kota Bharu just after when the alleged abuse of power took place. No action was taken.

Recently there was another report made in the Klang Valley by the same complainant on the same allegation involving the same MACC person. So far that too has been met with silence on both the PDRM and the MACC side.

Is the MACC covering for the wrong-doings by its ranks?

The Silence Is MACC

  
Roughly a year ago the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission began drumming up for war against 1MDB with one goal and one goal only – to piece together selective evidences collected so there would be a corruption case against Najib Razak. As an investigator, that is how I perceive the investigation conducted by the MACC.

Recently, there has been an exposé on a certain property at No.25 Jalan Pinhorn in Georgetown, Pulau Pinang. In the words of MCA’s Tan Khai Beng:

  
This is the property in question:

  
The S&P sounds VERY similar to the case of the original Mr Botox, Khir Toyo, the former Menteri Besar of Selangor who, with his cohorts, caused the serious erosion of support towards the Barisan Nasional and its subsequent virtually irrecoverable loss in Selangor in 2008. Khir was sentenced to 12 months (I wish it was years instead) imprisonment for a similar property deal.

  
While surrounding properties have been valued at between RM5 million to RM6 million, this particular property cost Lim Guan Eng almost a third of its value. When asked about the price, Guan Eng’s pathetic excuse was:

  
I don’t care so much about the property. My real concern is this:

  
Why hasn’t the MACC concluded the investigation into the sale and purchase of the property at No.25 Jalan Pinhorn? The investigation paper was opened in 2012 and it’s been four years already with no end in sight. I am beginning to question MACC’s apartisanship and the integrity of its officers.

Perhaps, the MACC too has a price.

Stop Breathe Think Act

Stop, think, breathe, act. It is a life-saving rule in times of trouble.  Monkeys are not known to be capable of acting this way.

Here, have a read at this first:

Press Statement by YB Zuraida on IGP Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar

2 September 2014

The IGP has gone overboard with his latest arrest of the Penang Voluntary Patrol Unit (PPS). As IGP, he cannot simply declare any society as illegal and should go through proper procedures. Any society unregistered with the ROS must first be declared illegal by the ROS like Hindraf. There must also be proof that the society had tried to register with the ROS and was declined its registration.

The scenario for PPS is different. PPS is part of the Penang State Government body and comprises of the state exco members and state assemblymen.

The IGP should be aware that he is a public servant and that the public’s interest comes first. The police force should not be used as a means to oppress the public.

PPS had always been a voluntary unit to help the community in emergencies and disasters. If the PDRM had been efficient, there would be no need for volunteers to step up and help the police in their work. These volunteers sacrifice their family time just to make their neighbourhood a safer place to live in. Due to the community spirit and selflessness of these PPS members, crime rates in Penang have gone down.

PPS was set up many years ago. There is no reason why the IGP should suddenly and unjustly call it illegal and start to crackdown on these innocent volunteers when all along, these PPS members report to their respective neighbourhood police stations before patrolling the area. Threatening to raid the homes of these volunteers unless they surrender themselves to the police is also absurd and an abuse of power.

The IGP has shown very weak leadership.

In the case of Victor Wong and Nasrul, both who offended the IGP by describing him as Henrich Himmler and Anjing BN respectively, and subsequently being directed by the IGP that both be investigated by the Police Cyber Investigation Response Centre (PCIRC) shows a lack of tolerance for personal opinion. Even after Victor Wong tweeted an apology to the IGP and PDRM, Khalid is bent on taking action against the two under Section 233 of the Communication and Multimedia Act 1998 and Sedition Act 1948.

These heavy-handed clampdown on those in opposition towards the Federal Government is a repeat of Operasi Lalang.

The IGP should be reminded that the PDRM is not his personal army.

YB Zuraida Kamaruddin
Ahli Parlimen Ampang
Ketua Wanita Keadilan

I instantaneously burst into laughter after reading the statement above. Of course, Zuraida aka Mak Lampir is just one of those Lab Monkeys the PKR fielded in 2008 and never expected to have won the seat.  Perhaps she, like Wan Azizah, need to have a good grasp of their surroundings and of current affairs before coming up with such bravado (Wan Azizah still thinks that the Lembaga Letrik Negara or LLN still exists!).

The Royal Malaysian Police only affected the arrest of more than a hundred members of the illegal Persatuan or Pertubuhan Peronda Sukarela (PPS) or whatever you call it by on the 31st August 2014, that Lim Guan Eng claims to have been set up four years ago under the powers vested to the Penang State Government to assist the police in crime-fighting.  However, members of the PPS have been seen putting up DAP party flags and banners instead and have been involved in acts that are extrajudicialis.  Nothing much is known about the PPS despite having been set up for four years. No paper work, no guidelines, nothing.  It is just a band of vigilantes set up in the name of the state government.

 

The action by the police was taken after a warning was issued for the PPS NOT to gather on the 31st August 2014.  This was after the letter below dated 26th August 2014 from the Registrar of Societies was received:

Letter from RoS on the status of the PPS
Letter from RoS on the status of the PPS

With such information in hand, only idiots like Zuraida and those who support her still think that it is absurd and an abuse of police power for going after the members of the PPS.  Lim Guan Eng’s feeble attempt at equating the PPS to the JKKK is also a funny act.  The JKKK (Jawatankuasa Keselamatan dan Kemajuan Kampung) is formed under the local government to become a committee to channel issues affecting the socio-welfare, development and security of a kampung.  They do not have extra-judicial but absent powers and do not wear any uniform like that of the PPS.

Sméagol and Gollum. Innocent and dangerous at the same time.
Sméagol and Gollum. Innocent and dangerous at the same time.

If Lim Guan Eng is so adamant that the police in Penang are short-handed, why not utilise the funds paid tot he PPS members to provide allowances to support the RELA and Rukun Tetangga initiatives, both which are legal organisations empowered to assist the police when needed? Why the need to set up a shady uniformed organisation that has no guideline whatsoever and does all DAP’s biddings?

Anyway, as I mentioned, Zuraida is a lab monkey from the 2008 era. Had she read the letter from the RoS above and understood its content and where it falls on the timeline, she might not have issued such  press statement that excites the public’s disaffection against the administration of justice.

Zuraida Kamaruddin's press release smacks of seditious tendencies
Zuraida Kamaruddin’s press release smacks of seditious tendencies

As other lab monkeys gone rogue, she needs to be hauled up too!