Month: January 2012

Posted on

If Your Friends Cannot Trust You, Then Who Are You?

Not too long ago, I was both elated and afraid when the Vice-Presidency of PAS was filled with the likes of Nasharudin Mat Isa, who read at the University of Glasgow.  For once, PAS was filled by people with IQ, instead of the Mullah-like characters from their Dewan Ulama.  In 2009, all that changed when he was defeated by Mat Sabu and other Ataturks (Mahfuz Omar et al), who then went on to become the Deputy President of PAS in 2011, the first non-Alim (singular, Ulama is plural) to be in that position in over a quarter of a century.  PAS is now said to be 60% in control of the Ataturks, and only 30% by the Dewan Ulama.

PAS was ultra-radical in its political approach and its battle-cry had always been to set-up an Islamic nation, based on its myopic interpretation of what is considered Islamic.  The implementation of Hudud and Qisas (I wonder why Ta’zir was omitted) was their aim, much to the chagrin of fellow Barisan Alternatif partner, DAP. Somehow, it forewent this battle-cry in the 2008 General Elections to adopt a “more people-friendly” tagline of “welfare first.”  With this, they had PAS Supporters’ Club formed for non-Muslim supporters of PAS.

It was a shock to many that a person of Mat Sabu’s morale got elected to the No.2 post of a supposed Islamic party.  In December of 1995 (I stand corrected as to the actual date), Mat Sabu was charged for being in close proximity with one Normah Halim, wife of Bukhari Noor, a Kelantanese businessman, in Room 121 of Hotel Perdana in Kota Baru.  While he was acquitted due to technical reasons (the two witnesses could not agree on the room number where the offence took place), one should not forget that the act was committed.

There was also a recording of a telephone conversation supposedly between Mat Sabu and Normah done back in 1994.

Mat Sabu made headlines last year after claiming that communist Mat Indera, who led the murder of 18 policemen at the Bukit Kepong Police Station in 1950, and then murdered their family, as the true nationalist.  Nine days later, on 30th August 2011, Karpal Singh, a DAP veteran and MP for Bukit Gelugor responded saying that the 25 policemen were true nationalists and that Mat Sabu’s statements were ill-advised.  PAS, however, has gone to defend Mat Sabu’s claims and statements.  Mat Sabu, the joker, is now an idol worshipped by many in PAS:

Just last year, Dr Hasan Ali, a PAS VP, defended the actions of the Selangor Religious Department (JAIS) raiding the Damansara Utama Methodist Church for an attempt to proselytize Muslims.  The full report submitted by JAIS has never been brought forth by the Menteri Besar, but His Royal Highness the Sultan of Selangor decreed that JAIS’s action was right and lawful, hence underscoring the dangers of proselytizing of Muslims by Evangelists.  This was carried in PAS Selangor’s website.  Yet, three months after this story was carried by the party’s state organ, Dr Hasan Ali was expelled from PAS for not toeing party line, or not following the spirit of Selangor’s Pakatan Rakyat.

Hasan Ali Relieved JAIS Acted Correctly

The removal of Hasan Ali from PAS is another signal that the Ataturks are now in power.  The level of distrust against PAS is further demonstrated by the other Pakatan Rakyat partners, DAP and PKR, when it was announced that the Menteri Besar, Khalid Ibrahim, who is from PKR, would hold the exco position instead of another PAS state representative.  What qualification Khalid has is one issue.  The other being, why not PAS?  Khalid, of course, is being labeled by many as DAP’s mule, rather than being an effective PKR’s Menteri Besar.

I do not know how much power is wielded by the President, Hj Hadi Awang, who seems encircled by the Ataturks.  Whether he still calls the shots in PAS, nobody really knows.  Suddenly, I read in an online news that Hj Hadi offers himself to NOT be nominated to stand for the next General Elections.

Haji Hadi Tak Nak Bertanding PU13

I don’t know if it is a sign that he is not confident PAS will attain the same level of support from the masses and wishes not to be associated with any downfall, or if he is being forced to not lead PAS by the Ataturks,  He would know best.  However, reading Hadi’s statement below reminds me of one person who has yet to step down, although promised on several occasions to do so:

When is Nik Aziz resigning?

If Hadi resigns, that would pave the way for Ataturks like Mat Sabu and Mahfuz Omar to lead the so-called Islamic party – people with morale baggage that DAP could use to blackmail for support.

There is also talk that the Menteri Besar of Kedah, Dato Seri Azizan from PAS, will also be ousted from the party for not toeing Pakatan Rakyat’s stand on the Universities/University Colleges Act (AUKU).  Azizan recently defended the use of AUKU against some KUIN students, and got salvos fired at him from every Pakatan Rakyat direction.  Azizan’s rationale was simple: AUKU is an act of law, and therefore should be upheld.

If PAS in its present form cannot be trusted to lead a state’s religious affairs, respect Acts of Law, or even champion the cause of Islam, should we even trust it to run the states it is already running, let alone running a country while protecting the sanctity of Islam in this nation?

I think not.  What you think is none of my concern.

With that, I leave you some entertainment courtesy of Mat Sabu and Ambiga.

Posted on

Who’s The Zionist-Friendly Guy In Town?

The Jew Boy
Blue-Eyed Muslim Boy of the Zionists?

So much for linking BN to APCO and Israel and what not.

This article from the Wall Street Journal goes to prove who is the blue-eyed boy of the Zionists in the Muslim world.

The image below was captured from the 4th last paragraph of the said article:

So, what did Anwar say about Israel that the BN has never said?

So, what was it about BN and APCO, Urko?

Posted on

Caveat And Crap

On the 9th of January, 2012, Anwar Ibrahim was acquitted from a sodomy charge (dubbed Sodomy 2.0) on technical reasons.  The DNA specimen that was submitted as one of two incriminating evidences, was found to be tainted.  Anwar, as were people on both sides of the political fence, was caught by surprise.  Later, Anwar was reported to have said that he will amend the law pertaining to sodomy which he opined as being archaic.  In doing so, he condemns not just the law, but also Holy Books of Peoples of the Book as being equally archaic.

To some benighted supporters of his, this event proves Anwar’s innocence and that he is not a sodomite.  Perhaps, they should re-read the judgment of the Appellate Court when releasing Anwar from jail for Sodomy 1.0. Critically, the majority judgment says, “we find evidence that the appellants were involved in homosexual activities.”  It is this point that many in the media, particularly outside Malaysia, missed.  What the judges couldn’t find evidence for was the dates.

In one respect the majority judgment went further than earlier courts.  It was found that the driver “was an accomplice” to the acts of sodomy.  Earlier courts had judged him to be a victim.  To put it crudely, the judges paint a picture of a happy threesome rather than of two aggressors.

Just when every one was ready to put Sodomy 2.0 behind them, and Anwar picking up momentum in his life-long quest to become the Prime Minister, the Prosecution had decided to appeal.  Anwar’s spin-doctors quickly went into an attack mode claiming that the Barisan Nasional is bent on keeping Anwar out of Putrajaya; but in reality his “victim’s” father appealed to the Public Prosecutor to appeal, and that process is part of the processes of natural justice.  If anyone has a problem with that, he or she ought to move to Rwanda or Angola, or even to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.  A caveat from me is I hope the Prosecution has compelling evidences this time to incriminate Anwar, else this would be another waste of time.

In an unrelated development, after a long while of pussyfooting, it was decided that the assets of the National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd be frozen – an gesture that would have won political points had it been done some three months ago.  This decision was made a day after the person in focus, Minister Shahrizat Jalil, announced that she was going on leave for three weeks to assist the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission in its investigation of her family-run company.

Shahrizat has also sued Ampang MP Zuraida Kamaruddin and PKR’s Strategy Director, Rafizi Ramli over what she claimed to be acts of defamation.  While that is within her rights to sue people who defame her, she must also remember Newton’s three laws of motion.

I. Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it.

First and foremost, as a Cabinet Minister, she should have advised her husband against applying for a government grant or loan to start a personal business, OR, she should have resigned and helped her husband in running the multi-million Ringgit business.  Going against the norm, or disturbing the equilibrium causes motion.

II. The relationship between an object’s mass m, its acceleration a, and the applied force F is F = ma. Acceleration and force are vectors (as indicated by their symbols being displayed in slant bold font); in this law the direction of the force vector is the same as the direction of the acceleration vector.

As she is a Minister, she should have realised that being such a huge public figure would cause acceleration of public perception.  The negative force against her was produced by the combination of her being a huge public figure and the acceleration of public negative perception of the issue.

III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Well and good that she is taking action against those whom she claims to have defamed her.  However, a caveat from me: I hope she is prepared if the sued party calls for documents related to what the defamation was all about – and that can cause equal pain to her as well as to members of her family.

This is going to be one crappy but interesting quarter of 2012.

With that, I would like to take this opportunity to wish all of you Gongxi facai.

Posted on

While The Malays Sleep

For the life of me I am just too lazy to search for the video that I want to put into this posting.  Maybe for starters, Shahrizat Jalil could have asked her husband to take a look at this video first before getting involved in the NFC. For GE13, I don’t think it is fair for BN supporters to be answering on Shahrizat’s personal issue on behalf of her and her family as the BN members at large do not benefit from the business.

Coming from a renowned boarding school in Kuala Kangsar, I am privy to some info from old boys who are pro-government supporters as well as from those who oppose.  With 9th January looming on the weekend’s horizon (I am writing this on a Saturday while waiting for my wife to finish making her Mee Tomato), the story of succession in both PKR and Pakatan Rakyat in general, comes to mind.  It is interesting to note that some people in PKR’s up there has hinted that the Youth Chief of PKR, Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, will take over the helm.  Nurul Izzah, the daughter of Anwar Ibrahim, is being promoted by her mother, Dr Wan Azizah, much to the behest of Anwar’s long-time loyal-for-some-fishy-reason lieutenant, Azmin Ali, who wants the Party’s No.1 position all to himself, while the name of Badrul Hisham Shaharin, Rembau’s PKR’s Chief, was not mentioned at all.  Badrul Hisham lost in his bid for the No.1 Youth’s position to incumbent Shamsul Iskandar, and therefore does not have the locus standi (if I may use that term) to stake his claim at the National level.

Shamsul Iskandar’s appointment would serve DAP’s and PAS’s interest as it would seem to be a move away by PKR from Anwar’s shadow.  Anwar, who used to walk the streets flanked by leaders of the other opposition parties, now often seen walking alone up the staircase of the court during his sodomy trial, save for the company of his wife, daughters, and occasionally, Azmin himself.  But Shamsul Iskandar may not be welcomed by DAP and PAS to replace Anwar, whom they have successfully jockeyed for political mileage and support to get on the plane they are on now.  It would be naive to say that both DAP and PAS do not know of Anwar’s character weaknesses as the latter was part of the BN machinery; and especially DAP, had put a lot of effort in exposing BN MP’s dirty linen in public. Therefore, another leader, acceptable by both DAP and PAS, and some members of the public, would be the best to lead – and this person is reported to be none other than Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah himself.  PKR, being the weakest among the three parties, would have to accept this decision and take the backseat duty thenceforth.

I think it was on New Year’s Day that I saw the headline on one tabloid quoting DAP as saying, “We don’t need the MB’s seat.”  This was, I think, made in response to speculations.  We all know that in the states of Perak (when it was briefly under the Pakatan Rakyat) and Selangor, the real administrator of the states was and still is for Selangor, the DAP.  Even when the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) was raided by the Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS), Khalid Ibrahim, the de jure Menteri Besar, quickly apologised to Pastor Daniel Ho on the Thursday after the 2nd August 2011 raid.  On the 8th the de jure Menteri Besar had a “meeting” with several DAP excos such as Tan Kok Wai, Ronnie Liu, Ean Yong Hian Wah, V. Ganabathiroa & Senator S. Ramakrishnan.  The result of the meeting can be found here.  Dr Hasan Ali, the Selangor State Religious Affairs Exco was immediately bashed by all quarters from the Pakatan Rakyat over this issue.  Dr Hasan Ali holds his ground until now, while fellow Selangor parliamentarian from PAS, Khalid Samad, is reported to deny that the act of proselytizing never took place at the DUMC, and continues to deny.  This is despite the fact that HRH The Sultan of Selangor had issued a proclamation that the act did take place (please refer to the full text of HRH’s proclamation).   I always wonder what hold does the DAP have on Khalid Ibrahim and Khalid Samad that they seem to be dragged by their nose by the former on this issue.

PAS is also seen as digressing away from its original path.  With the Ataturks (I refuse to term them as Erdogans, as Tayyib Erdogan fights for Islam while Ataturk fights for power, doing away with Islam) having 60% control and the Ulama controlling only 30%, PAS now seems to have forgone Islam and would deal with the Devil himself for power.  People with baggages like Mat Sabu and Mahfuz Omar now sit as Vice Presidents of PAS.  These are people who can easily be held at ransom given their past.  How do you see them lead a so-called Islamist party?  I personally feel that they are nothing more than Trojan horses for a force outside PAS, that would lead PAS to kowtow to anything that the other partners in Pakatan Rakyat do.

Gunning for Johor
Pakatan Rakyat is gunning for Johor

The Penang government led by DAP also tried to introduce mosque committee elections.  This, in my opinion, was malicious of nature.  DAP knows that it has a solid support from the Chinese voters in Penang, but not so from the Malays.  Perhaps mosque elections would split congregations politically, and dilute Malay solidarity at the grassroot level.

Recently, we also saw attacks on Article 153 of the Federal Constitution – a move seen to chip away at the Special Rights given to the Malays and other Bumiputeras.  There was even an attempt to confuse the masses by introducing historical facts that are totally wrong and misleading.  DAP-led forces are also trying to dilute UMNO’s influence in its final bastion – Johor.  If  UMNO’s influence in Johor  could be drastically weakened, BN may not even win a simple majority. And UMNO may be forced to abdicate its seat as the leading party in BN.

I have nothing against other races.  What I have is hatred towards those who are bent on chipping away at the fundamentals that have been holding this nation together.  While the Malays sleep, DAP continues to chip away at their cohesiveness, and spirit of Malayness that we used to see not too long ago; but these values have eroded so much that many do not realise the implications of losing the Special Rights.  While I take swipes at what I think is wrong with people in UMNO, I am against any attempt to usurp the power of the Malays through the religion of Islam and the protection of the institution of the Malay Rulers.  If Pakatan Rakyat wins 2/3 majority, with DAP being the biggest winner, DAP will be in the position to propose for amendments to the Federal Constitution.  The Malay Rulers would have a smaller role, probably similar to what was proposed during the Malayan Union, and would be powerless to even protect the religion of Islam in their respective state.

By then, it would be too late for the Malays to wake up from their slumber.

Posted on

So Did The Police Beat Some Students? Part 2

After the first revelation via the press statement by the Vice Chancellor of UPSI sent yesterday, I received an E-mail from an undisclosed source that contained a copy of an E-mail sent by the UPSI College Principal.

FYA
—– Original Message —–
From: “Mohammad Aziz Shah Mohamed Arip” <xxxx.xxxx@fppm.upsi.edu.my>
To: “Kakitangan Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris” <xxxxxxxxxx@upsi.edu.my>
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 3:11:56 AM
Subject: ALIRKAN TENAGA POSITIF 2012 – RENUNGAN SEMULA RUSUHAN DI PINTU UTAMA UPSI

SELAMAT TAHUN BARU 2012 YANG PENUH DENGAN KEJAYAAN SEKALI LAGI. 
IZINKAN SAYA BERKONGSI SEDIKIT. SAYA SANGAT SEDIH, SAYU DAN TERDIAM MELIHAT BETAPA KELICIKAN PIHAK LUAR DAN PARTI POLITIK MENGAMBIL KESEMPATAN PERISTIWA RUSUHAN PADA MALAM TAHUN BARU DI PINTU HADAPAN UPSI. 

JUSTERU, TAGGUNGJAWAB KITA, PENSYARAH DAN JUGA ULAMA IALAH HENTIKAN FITNAH DAN ALIRKAN TENAGA POSITIF BARU PADA TAHU BARU;

BERDASARKAN MAKLUMAT BERSAMA INDIVIDU YANG BERADA DI TEMPAT KEJADIAN KENYATAAN POLIS BERTINDAK GANAS DAN KEJAM ADALAH TIDAK BENAR DAN FITNAH. SEBALIKNYA, PARA PERUSUH YANG KEBANYAKKAN ORANG LUAR UPSI (HANYA 2 ORANG PELAJAR UPSI TERLIBAT IAITU ADAM ADLI DAN YUYU LUNA) TELAH BERTINDAK GANAS MAHU MEMANJAT DAN MEROBOHKAN PINTU UTAMA UPSI.. IBU KANDUNG KITA. POLIS SUDAH BERIKAN MEREKA MASA BERUCAP DAN MENJALANKAN UPACARA MEREKA YANG PENUH PENGHINAAN KEPADA ORANG LAIN. NAMUN, ARAHAN UNTUK BERSURAI TIDAK DIENDAHKAN SEBALIKNYA PINTU UTAMA UPSI MULA DI PANJAT DAN HENDAK DIROBOHKAN. TINDAKAN PROVOKASI INI MENYEBABKAN POLIS MULA MENGAMBIL TINDAKAN TEGAS DAN MENAHAN MEREKA TETAPI PARA PERUSUH TELAH MENENTANG MENYEBABKAN BERLAKU SEDIKIT PERGADUHAN FIZIKAL. PERUSUH SANGGUP BERLARI, MENJERIT DAN TERLANGGAR PINTU KACA KLINIK SYIFA (ADA PENDAPAT MENGATAKAN SENGAJA UNTUK MENDAPATKAN KECEDERAAN), LALU BERDARAH DENGAN AGAK BANYAK LALU GAMBAR DIAMBIL UNTUK FITNAH POLIS MEMUKUL MEREKA DAN PROVOKASI MERAIH SIMPATI TERMASUK DARI ULAMA)-(BUKTI PERISTIWA PERUSOH TERLANGGAR CERMIN KLINIK SYIFA BOLEH DITONTON DALAM YOUTUBE). PERUSUH JUGA MENGELUARKAN KATA KESAT DAN BERLAKON CEDERA PARAH. JUSTERU, BERITA MANGSA KOMA DAN CEDERA PARAH JUGA HARUS DINILAI SEMULA KERANA LAPORAN HOSPITAL HANYA SEORANG YANG DIRAWAT SEBAGAI PESAKIT LUAR DI HOSPITAL SLIM RIVER. MUNGKIN HANYA PROVAKASI POLITIK MERAIH SIMPATI… DALAM KES INI JUGA SAYA SANGAT TERKILAN KERANA KEBANYAKKAN ULAMA-ULAMA YANG DIHORMATI TERLALU CEPAT MEMBERI KOMEN BERDASARKAN BERITA DAN SUMBER PROVOKASI, SEPATUTNYA MENUNGGU SEHINGGA MENDENGAR DARI DUA PIHAK (SEPERTI DALAM AJARAN ISLAM). SAYA JUGA TERGAMAM MELIHAT BETAPA PIHAK LUAR BEGITU PANTAS MENGGUNAKAN SISTEM IT DAN MEMANIPULASI SETIAP KENYATAAN INDIVIDU TERTENTU UNTUK DIMANIPULASIKAN DEMI KEPENTINGAN MEREKA. INI ADALAH TIDAK JUJUR. POLITIK PIHAK LUAR YANG MENJADIKAN UPSI SEBAGAI MEDAN POLTIK MEMERLUKAN SEMUA PIHAK MATANG MEMBERI KOMEN DAN SURAT. SAYA JUGA TIDAK MENYOKONG SEBARANG TINDAKAN PROVAKASI SEMULA OLEH UPSI SEBAGAI TINDAKBALAS… KERANA KITA AKAN MERENDAHKAN MAQAM DIRI DAN BERMARUAH SEPERTI MEREKA. TETAPI SAYA PERCAYA KITA PERLU MENYALURKN MAKLUMAT YANG BETUL, DAN SANGAT TEGAS BERTINDAK DAN MENGAMBIL TINDAKAN TATATERTIB BERANI DAN TEGAS BERDASARKAN HAK, PERATURAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG YANG KTA ADA. SAYA SANGAT PERCAYA TINDAKAN PERUSUH INI TIDAK DISOKONG HAMPIR KESELURUHAN WARGA UPSI YANG SAYANGKAN PROFESION PERGURUAN. BAGI PELAJAR GALASLAH HARAPAN IBU BAPA, TARGET 4.0, BERFIKIR MATANG, BANYAK BERISTIGFAR DALAM HATI DAN YAKINLAH UNTUK MENJADI PENDIDIK KEPADA NEGARA… JIKA RAKAN-RAKAN BERSETUJU DENGAN PENDAPAT SAYA SEBARKANLAH KEPADA SEMUA – IKHLAS PENGETUA KOLEJ UPSI – DR MOHAMMAD AZIZ SHAH MOHAMED ARIP
Posted on

So Did The Police Beat Some Students?

I received a copy of a press release from the Vice-Chancellor (Students Affairs) of UPSI on the incident where 15 students were arrested for demonstrating at the University. Some students claimed that they got seriously injured after being roughed up by the police.

Or were they?

Kenyataan Akhbar Kronologi Peristiwa Perhimpunan Haram Depan UPSI pada 1 Januari 2012.

 

Pada jam 5pm UPSI dapat maklumat  bahawa kumpulan mahasiswa Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia akan berkumpul di UM untuk mengadakan demonstrasi di UPSI. Demonstrasi ini adalah untuk mendesak kerajaan memansuhkan AUKU dan menuntut pertuduhan pada Adam Adli digugurkan.

Jam 10pm , kumpulan SMM dari UM dengan 3 kenderaan telah menuju  ke UPSI. Wartawan dan beberapa kumpulan kecil mewakili pembangkang  berkumpul di depan pintu utama UPSI dan kawasan sekitar

Pihak Keselamatan UPSI telah menutup semua laluan masuk ke upsi sepenuhnya, berkawal bersama bantuan suksis. Pihak polis berpakaian freeman mengawasi jalan-jalan utama di bahagian pintu timur dan utama selain rondaan traffic serta peronda (show force)

Demi menjaga maruah UPSI seramai 80 pelajar UPSI daripada beberapa kolej yang cintakan keamanan bersedia mempertahan UPSI dari gangguan pihak luar – dengan slogan “we love upsi “. Majoriti pelajar tidak suka dengan cara pihak luar campur tangan hal dalaman upsi. Upsi bertindak tanpa mana-mana tekanan pihak luar. Rata-rata Face book dan blog yang cintakan upsi, menyatakan sokongan agar bumi upsi tidak diganggu oleh pihak luar dan pelajar berhak pertahan nama baik institusi pendidikan ini.

Sekitar jam 2.10 pagi pelajar-pelajar  akhirnya memulakan demonstrasi di depan pintu utama dengan melaungkan slogan menentang kerajaan dan menuduh upsi dan tnc mengugut pelajar, dan mereka mengeluarkan kata kesat (barua, anjing) terhadapPerdana Menteri, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi, kerajaan, UMNO dan pemimpin UPSI. Mereka membawa kain rentang putih dan keranda daripada kotak serta membawa gambar PM sebagai simbolik pemansuhan AUKU. Polis membenarkan dengan pengawasan untuk mereka melaksanakan ucapan, jeritan, bacaan puisi dan upacara simbolik pemansuhan AUKU.  Pada waktu ini Adam Adli dibawa terus ke depan pagar upsi dijulang utk berucap berkaitan kebebasan akademik, ada dikalangan mereka juga menjerit agar pagar dibuka dan memanjat pagar pintu utama. Mereke terus melaungkan slogan power mahasiswa selang seli dengan ucapan, tanpa henti dengan nada suara jeritan. Mereka disokong oleh beberapa wakil dari parti pembangkang sepanjang demo berlaku.

2 20am Polis menempatkan kenderaan dan anggota LSF (light strike force – bukan FRU) bagi menghadapi sebarang kemungkinan dan apabila LSF tiba mengambil tempat didepan simpang klinik shifa, kumpulan mereka (lelaki dan wanita) telah mengambil tindakan baring di atas jalan raya, bertindak sebagai perisai manusia serta konfran polis supaya tidak mengapa-apakan mereka atau berdepan tindakan revolusi pelajar seperti mesir dan Tunisia. Yang paling lantang antara mereka adalah Khalid Ismet, pelajar undang2 um (pakai baju merah, muka macam cina) cuba provokasi pihak LSF dan polis. Polis sekadar mengawasi, tiada sebarang kekerasan atau apa-apa tindakan provokasi.

235am mereka telah bergerak menghampiri pintu pagar utama dan melaungkan “Buka Pintu” dan mereka telah memanjat pintu pagar dan menjerit supaya “membuka pintu dan jangan menjadi barua UMNO”. Pintu pagar upsi telah digegarkan oleh mereka , ada yang memanjat pagar untuk memasuki dan apabila masa yang diberikan tamat, ocpd mengarahkan polis penangkap membuat tangkapan kepada kelompok tersebut selain ingin mengelakkan mereka menceroboh ke dalam upsi dan dibimbangi akan bergaduh dengan anggota pelajar suksis upsi, serta  pemimpin pelajar yang berada dalam kampus. Pelajar-pelajar UPSI di dalam pagar tidak rela kampus mereka dicerobohi oleh para pelajar luar.

Oleh kerana mereka  tidak mengindahkan arahan polis supaya bersurai dengan aman, mereka telah bergelut dengan pihak polis untuk membebaskan rakan mereka yang telah ditangkap dan waktu itulah rusuhan berlaku dan ada di antara mereka telah memecahkan pintu kaca (berkunci) Klinik Syifa dengan alasan rakan mereka sakit sesak nafas  untuk dapatkan rawatan. Mereka dengan ganas memecahkan 3 panel dinding cermin klinik shifa. Polis tidak sesekali menggunakan kekerasan masa nak menangkap dan tidak memukul, mereka yang melawan sehingga terjatuh, malah anggota polis juga terjatuh semasa usaha menangkap mereka. Kecederaan berdarah yang dialami salah sorang dari mereka bukan kerana kekerasan polis tetapi terluka semasa mereka memecahkan dinding cermin klinik panel. Pihak polis telah menangkap 17 orang dan membawa mereka ke Balai Polis Tanjung Malim untuk ditahan, termasuk Adam Adli.

 

Keadaan kembali tenang selepas polis menahan 17 orang tersebut dan mengarahkan semua bersurai, polis tidak menahan pelajar wanita kecuali seorang pelajar upsi yang hadir ke balai dengan sukarela dan ditahan di sana. Polis meneruskan pengawasan terutama jalan utama depan upsi sehingga pagi bagi mengelak perkara tidak diingini berlaku.

Tindakan sepenuh pada tanggungjawab polis kerana diluar kawasan upsi dan tnchepa mengarahkan agar staf/pelajar berada didalam dan tidak membuat provokasi, sekadar memerhati walaupun dituduh dengan pelbagai kata-kata kesat.

 

ACP/KS DATO’ DR JUNAIDY ABU BAKAR

TIMBALAN NAIB CANSELOR (HAL EHWAL PELAJAR)

UNIVERSITI PENDIDIKAN SULTAN IDRIS

TANJONG MALIM